Hot Hot Take: Conspiracy Edition

Take a look at this picture.

That is, indeed, Sheila Jackson-Lee, U.S. Representative from the 18th Congressional District of Texas. While this woman is astonishingly stupid, one picture of Sheila Jackson-Lee isn't much to shake the proverbial stick at - if you don't mind me butchering an old colloquialism.

But what's on her finger allegedly is. If you don't mind looking closely at the ring on her finger, you may notice that said ring sports an interesting design: A triangle that runs into itself. Allegedly, and I will return to the alleged in a moment, this design is a pedophile symbol, according to those among us who claim expertise on the narrow field of pedophile symbology.

Now, I cannot confirm whether or not pedophiles have adopted symbols by which they may quietly signal their preferences to one another. It is interesting to me that a .pdf was released by Wikileaks some time ago, which you can reference here. It would not surprise me if pedophiles used codes and symbols to signal to one another. Pedophiles, being a group or caste, would be likely to develop their own internal culture (however despicable) much the same way groups as innocuous as RC airplane enthusiasts have their own internal culture. Groups far less innocent than that, who routinely engage in illegal activities - habitual drug users and gang members, for example - develop their own internal culture, language, symbols, etc. of which there is generally wider public knowledge. Why would it be less so for a group engaging in the ultimate social taboo? If there is a subset of the population that routinely engages in cannibalism, I would also expect that they, too, would develop their own internal culture, assuming that they were capable of congregating.

That said, I still cannot satisfactorily confirm, for my own purposes, that they symbol on Sheila Jackson-Lee's finger is a pedophilic symbol. It certainly is intriguing, and if you happen to watch the CSPAN archived recording of the December 16, 2009 meeting pictured in the above image, you can confirm for yourself that this image is, indeed, genuine. You'll see it at the 5:01 mark.

I was certainly moved when I did the research myself and watched the recording of the meeting in question. I cannot say to you, without lying, that my pulse rate didn't rise when I saw videographic confirmation that Sheila Jackson-Lee was, indeed, wearing jewelry that matched a known pedophilic symbol. It would not be untrue for me to say that I want to believe. But want or no, my purpose here is not to substantiate that our overlords are a cabal of pedophiles. I'll leave that to you to figure out for yourself.

I generally do not indulge in conspiracies, as I have mentioned in several other posts. I generally do not do this because, like the constant griping about a certain tribe of coin clutching merchants, I see conspiracies as a counterproductive force. Reading about conspiracy theories is an interesting past time - certainly one of my stranger hobbies - but there comes a point where you depart from merely orbiting that black hole. You enter the event horizon, and nothing short of a miracle will pull you back out. I've seen it before with my own eyes, the madness - oh the madness. And it is, indeed, maddening to think of the more convincing conspiracies. Constantly fretting over it, in my opinion, serves us more as a placebo than as actual medicine. There are other things you should be doing! Lift weights, read old books, make friends, fall in love with a woman who has fallen in love with you. Become great! The false promise of easy (if painful to swallow) knowledge a conspiracy theory lends an individual inhibits him from creating his own destiny. His own invictus. It becomes an obsession, and then consumes him. He will grow no further, turn inwards, and hollow himself out, only to replace his potential with a sort of deification of a power other than his own. Let me tell you about the Jews, etc.

There are no shortcuts worth taking because nothing worthy is ever gained without extracting the appropriate cost. Your muscles can be artificially swollen with synthol but you will still be pathetic and weak even if you manage to make your synthol injections appear natural. When a savage challenges you, he will throw you down and carry off your woman. The same, I think, holds true for the promise of hidden knowledge conspiracy theories offer. I cannot think of a better analogy, so let's leave it be.

That long winded (I am a reactionary) caveat out of the way, allow me to contradict myself somewhat.

Should there be some sort of mass revelation that unequivocally shows (i.e. through video evidence) that our elites are Satan worshiping pedophiles, I would not in the least be surprised. This isn't because of the purported evidence surrounding Pizzagate and QAnon, but because our elites have already demonstrated through their public actions that they are unrepentantly evil. I need not reiterate their crimes to increase the wordcount of this essay. I am no longer in college and therefore word counts don't matter much anymore. That said, should Pizzagate and QAnon be revealed as a rather elaborate bit of larping, my opinion on our elites would not change the slightest. You and I, friend, see beyond the veil already. We chose the path of the reactionary: the path less traveled. We have paid the price for delving too greedily and too deep. You know what it cost you. I know what it cost me. And consequent to that, we already know what others have only begun to suspect. I could wax poetic in true reactionary form for a few paragraphs, but brevity is the soul of wit, and some humble anon conveniently deduced the psychic fate of all reactionaries since the end of the Kings:

We don't need anything more. no elaborate conspiracies, no grand narratives, nothing, nothing, because we already know how awful things really are.

But you know who doesn't know? Normal, regular, everyday jackoffs.

Since we're on the topic of QAnon, one of the more interesting parts of the conspiracy is the alleged motive for Trump's presidential bid. He was asked to run, implicitly by a cabal of military officials. The 'why' belongs to those who have chosen to go down the rabbit hole. I have no need to, but you are free to do so - I really don't recommend this, by the way. But consider a hypothetical:

Suppose you needed to depose a wayward ruling class. They're completely off their rockers. Everything they touch turns to shit, and when they hold the most power things fall apart in the most spectacular fashion. If you want your nation to survive, these people have to go. So what do you do? Killing them is an obvious solution, but even if you managed to kill all of them, their offices, positions, titles and powers would only be vacant for a brief period, before someone else filled the void. How would you go about destroying them and discrediting the power they've gathered under themselves?

Something worth thinking about.

How Not To Rule

I attended a long string of high school graduations this month. I cannot say I particularly enjoy graduation ceremonies. Even out there, beyond the corn fields bordering the urban sprawl, when the principal or superintendent recites the "I confer up on you... that you have faithfully executed your academic duties... that you have met the standards set by..." blah blah blah, I am reminded that the insidious tentacles of the Cathedral truly reach far and wide. Even out here. A man, disgruntled and sweating in the 95 degree heat commented on the quantity of teachers and how he now understood why his property taxes were so high. A few people around him chuckled. The pensions! Ah, the pensions.

---

If I were to say that conservatives were the sort of people who routinely fail to see the forest from the trees, that would be unduly charitable. To take the metaphor and extend it appropriately to describe your average Republican thinker (syndicated or otherwise), it's not just that they don't see the forest. They don't even see a tree, because they're too busy staring at a single leaf. Case in point, the curious tendency of our ruling class to sympathize, if not wholeheartedly subscribe to, the teachings of Karl Marx. Well, it may not be exactly fair to say that they subscribe to Karl Marx, because a cursory reading of the Communist Manifesto should alert the most unserious of students to the decidedly bourgeois nature of academic communists. Then again, most academic communists haven't actually read Marx.

Anyways, conservatives, when their political lethargy and cowardice are not otherwise inhibiting them, will sputter about how communism doesn't work and how communism killed one hundred million people and even, if they happen to be slightly more clever than the rest, will recite Rothbard's explanation on how communism necessitates managerialism, begetting a classed society, and returning communists to the rejected premise of a stratified society.

That's actually the point, dummkopf.

The whole point of the wholehearted subscription to communism isn't to bring about a better world. Perhaps somewhere in the back of their minds these sort of people believe that communism is, indeed, a more just system than whatever you want to call the system we're living under. But justice, true justice or otherwise, is a decidedly ancillary goal for these people. So ancillary in fact, that the rotten consequences of putting communists into power are basically as inconsequential as a bug colliding with a windshield. Why is that? Because goal numero uno is a goal sadly rooted in the solipsistic nature of our bourgeois friends: The acquisition of power, and all of it's benefits, minus the responsibility and obligations. Next thanksgiving when your obnoxious relatives screech about the Trumpenreich, remember not to marvel too hard at the thought of a world run by these sort of people being the sort of world where one hundred million people starve to death, purposefully or otherwise.

Of course, "total communism", a-la the rhetoric of stupid idiots such as this unfortunate young woman, the theory of, the implementation there of, and life under, are the leaf you don't want to get caught staring at, lest we find ourselves to have degenerated into conservatives. So help me God, may I never.

---

The distribution of power has been repeatedly fractured since the dissolution of the European monarchies. Each iteration of power smashing did not reduce the sum total power, as it were, but rather distributed it among a wider, more specific tier of people. To childishly simplify the idea of power distribution, first we had kings, then we had an aristocracy, followed by senators under republicanism, which eventually beget the individualized power of the mob. Each step down has been a disastrous lurch towards anarchy as the new power holders scrambled over one another to consolidate as much power as they could, before they died and the power evaporated as their corpses cooled to room temperature.

In the here and now, power has degenerated so much that the petty squabbling of self-interested parties is almost entirely comprised of the college educated, aspirational urbanite class. Once in a while, the mob contracts violently and vomits out a class of people to shave off a fraction of competitors for those tiny shards of power. Most obviously, since you are probably a dissident right-winger, the whole "white privilege" schtick was less about rectifying social ills and more about removing competition for power, resources, access, social networks, whatever. The Alt-Right mistakes the over-representation of Jews among the power grubbing nascent and real elite for an explicit conspiracy by our coin-clutching guests, rather than the implicit conspiracy of a group of people predisposed to grasp at social authority because they are, ahem, less-than-worthy by any classic metric of "who-should-rule vs. who-should-be-ruled". In a sane world, these sort of people would have been, how shall I say this politely? Put down?

Less obviously, the mob recently experienced - really, is still experiencing - a violent contraction vis-a-vis the #metoo movement. Hilariously, most of the expelled are prominent Jewish males in the media class, with a smattering of Black and White men as well. How exactly this coincides with the explicit conspiracy of Jewish power is, frankly, beyond my interest in attempting to explain. If you get stuck at "the Jews", you are unfortunately staring at that leaf again.

Consequent to the shattering power and the vicious scramble by newly enabled individuals to consolidate said power, the self-interested class of power seekers must constantly climb over one another for said power through the cancerous phenomenon called "virtue signalling". Because virtue signalling necessitates one-upsmanship, what is considered virtuous is subjected to an exponential curve. Forty years ago, 'virtuous' was not calling black people racial epithets. Twenty years ago, virtuous was having a black friend without noticing that your friend was black. Today, virtuous is ceding all moral authority to blacks - no matter how poorly behaved, no matter how ridiculous the circumstances. Again, to avoid leaf-gazing, I should strongly emphasize that mentioning blacks has nothing to do with blacks per-se, but has everything to do with the wildly degenerated condition of White people. Blacks don't do anything to us that we do not allow. Same for Jews, banks, globalists, Muslims, Mexican illegals, etc.

Several iterations of power shattering and the consequent scramble through virtue signalling is a highly degenerate selection pressure on would be leaders. We need not mince words here - the people who lead us are mostly awful. Whether they lead us from a seat in congress or from the media bully pulpit or from the red carpet, they are, almost without exception, awful. It isn't just that they themselves are often physically repugnant or hilariously deformed in some way - David Hogg's pathetic frame is a perfect example of what I mean by deformed - what's even worse is that they are bad at leading. You would be extremely hard pressed to find a subject matter where our ruling class actually made an improvement rather than made a problem worse.

Their ideas in and of themselves are utter garbage. Last post I joked about how these people effectively delude themselves into thinking that it is education that makes a person smart, rather than natural aptitude. They, of course, believe this entirely out of self-interest. They are educated, therefore they should rule! Probably an easier subject matter to illustrate what I'm getting at is the debate over the individual's right to own firearms. Forget, for a moment, that the vitriol aspirational urbanites spew at their gun-toting countrymen is entirely predicated on the (very well advised) fear that one day Cletus and Bubba and all their cousins and relations and neighbors might finally reach their breaking point with the snotty liberal douchebag shtick and lay waste to hipster neighborhoods (if only they would). The proposed mechanism behind gun controls is, at least on paper, hilarious. We'll just tell them to turn in their guns! Or, We'll get the cops or the army to go around and take their guns!

I really shouldn't have to explain to anyone why that's stupid. Besides the prospect of unarmed urbanites starting a war with people who own lots of guns, even more ammo, and who produce food, the idea that cops are going to be really enthusiastic about becoming a bullet sponge for some dipshit hipster's utopian wet dream is, well, only the sort of idea a demented ruling class could come up with.

Here's to hoping that they follow through.

Your Memes Are Shit, Vol. I of MCDLXXXVIII

I found this gem the other day. Notice, if you will, that this amusing little clip hits everything in all the right places. If I were a cultural anthropologist that had to explain to you the difference between the increasingly popular camps of the dissident Right and the failing, cracking foundations of Liberal Progressivism, I'd use this as my prime example.

Now, you might look a this and say, yes, well it is reasonably well constructed, and the anon who made it certainly put a lot of work into it. The doppler effect on "Sandstorm" is a particularly nice touch. But what makes this, of all things, stand out?

Well I'll tell you, anon.

It's the small details. The small details are self-referential, which in and of itself can be either good, or bad, depending on who you ask. For example, I've heard a few people say that they thought Borderlands was hilarious, and I've heard a few people say they hated the self referential humor. Anyways, what's interesting about the self-referential humor here is that it bridges quite a bit of 4chan's noble history. 4chan is interesting because it is essentially a massive engine of content generation. Others have mused at length about how this came to be, and the consensus appears to be something like this: 4chan's anonymous nature, removing the "I" from the equation, forces content into a weird crucible where merit is weighed without factoring identity. Everyone, aside from the universally reviled tripfags, is an anon, and therefore what exists beyond the words on the screen is irrelevant. Over the span of time and the progression of posts and threads, content sinks or swims based off of whether it gets a reaction. This has created a long string of in-jokes, and beyond that a nigh imperceptible string of failed jokes. What is even more interesting about 4chan is that /pol/ is a sort of breeding ground for disaffected right-wing types. Some of it is tongue in cheek, some of it is serious, and the degree to which an idea belongs in either category is... dubious, at times. The constant shitposting, even if some happens to come from CTR or ShareBlue, only seems to make /pol/ stronger. Prolonged exposure to 4chan generally, but particularly /pol/, increases the likelihood that the user will end up getting red pilled.

The other thing that is humorous about the .webm above is that it uses Star Wars as a medium. Anyone who is aware of the college-tier Leftist obsession with mass media will appreciate taking something precious from the enemy and ruining it.

College Republicans, like broken clocks, have their uses.

The unfortunate part of the .webm above is that I cannot explain it to an outsider. Memes only travel downstream. If I have to explain Boxxy to you, this meme is going to go over your head. It is interesting, however, being on the other side of the looking glass, so to speak.

I had someone send me a text image making fun of fat people. The text was styled exactly like the "it was my privilege" greentext stories that floated around about the time Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin. I didn't bother to explain where that came from or why it was popular - this person does not browse 4chan - but I was a little amused, and a little hopeful. What is good, what is really good that comes out of 4chan may have more of an effect on the gen-pop than anyone yet realizes. Like I said, this stuff is flowing downstream, and it'll be interesting to see where that takes us. 4chan's incivility ultimately provides the ammo a newer, younger old-style Right needs to emerge as the undisputed champion of the whole Right wing (Nationalist wing?) of the political spectrum. Its worth going into more detail on other thoughts about memetic warefare, but that's for another day.

---

In the mean time, to scratch the surface of weird territory I'm still not quite ready to descend into: Within the past couple of years, Russia stopped allowing the adoption of Russian orphans by American couples. Food for thought.

Punching Down

Hoisted by their own petard.

Its almost been beaten to death but why not give CNN one more kick for old times sake? What really catches my eye every time I read someone's take on CNN's antics is this line:

"CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change."

The optics of this whole affair are... not good. I have jokingly referred to Trump Derangement Syndrome but there is probably a fair bit more truth to the matter than as a sort of humorous jab at our globalist overlords and their blue-haired lackeys. Part of me has sympathies for the 'hidden truth' crowd that claims to one degree or another that the establishment's histrionics over der Trumpenführer stem from a fear that his presidency will result in the revelation of information that would be fatal to their wealth, prestige, power, and perhaps their lives. Whatever you think it is, and there is some fairly compelling evidence suggesting a much more complex story than what appears at surface level, only time will tell.

But a larger part of me thinks of those insufferable busybody moralists that occupy colleges and universities. Let's run through this one more time, shall we?

Trump retweets a .gif that puts CNNs logo on Vince McMahon as Trump attacks him during Wrestlemania 23's "Battle of the Billionaires". CNN and other media outlets respond with huffing indignation and histrionics claiming that Trump is sanctioning violence against media personalities. CNN then sets the full force of its industry to the cause of outing the memesmith who created the humorous image, and after discovering the identity of said memesmith, allegedly through a cucky apology that the stereotypical r/The_Donald denizen would offer up, CNN publishes an article where they essentially humblebrag that they've got this kid by the balls.

To the whole fucking world! They just put it up, right there!

Hello there, we are a gigantic corporation with more yearly revenue than you and your stupid hick family and stupid hick friends and your entire stupid hick town in flyover country will generate over the course of their entire lives. We have decided that we do not like the tone of your memes, and should you produce any more content that we find disagreeable, we will feed you to our army of rabid blue hairs.

To that sort of thing, I can only say:

Talk shit, get hit.

Also, Breivik did nothing wrong.

Quality Control

The common and fashionable way of thinking claims that America is divided between White and non-White. While indeed common and fashionable, this is also very surface level. People who frame politics this way - garden variety Millennial liberals, for instance - are not particularly insightful. Digging a little deeper, the Alt-Right claims that America is a captured nation, that the new Judeo-Globalist elite use third worlders as a gigantic stick to beat down Heritage America. This is a little better, but also causes the Alt-Right to fall into a sort of psychosis or downward spiral where the Jew is behind everything. To be honest, the Daily Shoah is sometimes hard to listen to because I get tired of hearing the same lines about the Hebrews. Whatever coin clutching malfeasance is currently in the spotlight - and there is no end to it, as I am sure you are well aware - this still is not a fully accurate description of the source of American political conflict.

The United States of America is a White nation currently in the midst of a cold White on White civil war. Minorities of all varieties are [currently] ancillaries. It is true that there are major non-White factions, but all of them are organized under the banner of White Leftism. White Leftists, by their nature, do not have the numbers, the martial acumen, the toughness or any sort of safe redoubt by which they may wage war on their provincial brethren. Minority groups essentially serve as mercenaries, barriers and cannon fodder for White Leftists. In exchange for attacking provincial Whites and serving as a distracting foil for the seething hatred the White Leftist feels for flyover country, the Left grants minority groups resources extracted from productive Whites. This, of course, is a classic deal with the devil. No matter how disparagingly you might view La Raza or Black Lives Matter, you cannot deny that there is a degree of self-interest in their activities, and the full breadth and width of their agency is wholly concerned with fulfilling their own needs. Some minority groups have far greater agency than others, which is why you find a disproportionate number of Ashkenazim at the upper strata of society. None the less, the less endowed, slow though they may be literally and otherwise, grow in strength and encroach upon the territory of White Leftism. That the roll of White Leftists as leaders of the Coalition of the Ascendant was downgraded from dubious to doubtful may cause some White Leftists to flee Postmodernism in the same way that White men fled Occupy Wall Street when it devolved into an identity shit-flinging festival. There are quiet rumblings of a sort of "Alt-Left", where disenchanted Bernie Bros are [allegedly] starting to realize that their dreams of socialism are being cock-blocked by burdensome minorities. Perhaps, only time will tell.

Millennial Leftists are particularly sensitive to prestige, and while at present Whites can still harvest prestige through flaunting their Leftist credentials, the Law of Diminishing returns and the demands of minorities that allied Whites shut up and follow their lead suggests that at some point, the prestige granted to Whites by being obedient, goodthinkful Leftists will be outweighed by the pain and shame inflicted by the wayward mercenaries the Left hired to fight their backwards, provincial brethren. If that comes to pass, we may see a massive conversion of Leftists into White identitarians. As I have said previously, for the TRS/Daily Stormer crowd this is a good thing. Their most pressing concern is that they need more bodies, without which they will have trouble making demands that the USG must take seriously.

Sympathetic though I am to the goys at TRS, I don't think that the pressured conversion of self-deprecating White Leftists to White identitarians would be anything more than a stop gap. Should Whites claim a White homeland, should the minorities be sent elsewhere and should a reckoning come to deal with the malfeasance of Globalism, Inc. there still remains an issue within the White population, namely that Whites abandoned eugenic selection pressure vis-a-vis reproductive quality control when Whites abandoned Feudalism. White people are wildly overbred, and I strongly suspect that what makes White Leftists so insufferable is not merely their ideology. Yes, the blue hairs are at best annoying and at worst the most wretched sort of traitors, but my suspicion is that the social conditioning program of Postmodernism isn't the only variable accounting for their wretched state. I'm not sure that you can necessarily condition someone to be insufferable, to have an unwarranted sense of self importance, to have a drive to constantly out-signal one another, etc. Postmodernism is the vector, but the disease may come from something else. I cannot currently quantify my suspicions, but perhaps this points us in the right direction:

Decline in White IQ from 1889 through 2004

Estimating IQ through simple reaction times, scientists claim that the average White IQ has depreciated by one full standard deviation. This fits neatly with a history lesson I first became aware of through Curt Doolittle of the Propertarian Institute. The advent of the Feudal/Manorial system created a highly eugenic selection pressure on Europeans by excluding those who could not form families and contribute to the economy, and by brutally hanging criminals. The end result of centuries of this pressure created the conditions by which high IQ, socially cohesive Europeans eventually negated their eugenic progression. With the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution the culling of those who couldn't slowed and eventually outbreeding accelerated, resulting in a general decline in the quality of Whites. Where our estimated average IQ once rivaled Ashkenazim, today we're barely above 100.

Whether there is a parallel decline in the quality of our character is a matter I can only speculate upon, but my gut feeling points to yes.

None the less, despite Progressive Liberalism's attempts to foil biology, today there seems to be another selection pressure hard at work upon the demographic groups fighting over the marrow and bones of Weimerica. There is a striking discrepancy between the birthrate of White conservatives and White liberals. White conservatives reproduce at slightly above replacement rate, while White liberals don't even come close. Others have made the same observation, that each new generation of Whites is more and more dominated by children sired by conservative parents, such that Generation Z is being [perhaps prematurely] dubbed "Generation Zyklon". There is, of course, some bleed-over from conservative parents who lose their children to the clutches of academia, but how consequential this loss is as a percentage of the would-be conservative population remains to be seen. Furthermore, something that gives the Generation Zyklon meme some serious legs is the fact that White youngsters are being lectured to death by cunty blue hairs that have fully embraced Postmodern dildo worship that berates them for the sin of being White in a nation that is increasingly not White. Very few of my peers from my Catholic School days still go to church, and given that Postmodernism is more virulent, more abrasive, more screeching and tyrannical than even the worst lecturer I have ever encountered in Christendom... I suspect that there will be some serious blow back.

Less commented on is the dysgenic effect the modern world may be having on minorities. The immediate cause of the low White liberal birthrate is that liberal women put off family formation in favor of careerism, which tends to lead to regrets down the road. The same academic-industrial complex compels minorities to favor careerism over family formation, but there is a pretty serious caveat:

Intelligence may be a more profound selector with regards to minorities entering university than Whites. Low average-IQ populations that qualify for affirmative action have a much shallower bench, as it were, of high IQ individuals. It is true that there are 150 IQ Blacks, the issue is that there are not many of them. Were Black America run competently, those select few 150 IQ individuals would be husbanded to increase the relative percentage of Blacks with similar levels of intelligence vis-a-vis heredity, while suppressing the lowest echelons of Blacks through some sort of sterilization program. Black America is, of course, run wildly incompetently, adversely pressured by clever rent-seekers among the Black population that only seek to enhance their wealth and prestige, and further pressured by White Leftists who place a higher premium on garish and very public displays of fake-altrusim than they do on finding solutions that work. Affirmative action none the less requires a higher degree of intelligence, in that Blacks who simply can't hack it in the ivory tower will end up washing out of their degree programs, sending them back to the ghetto as it were. Having a much shallower pool to draw from, and losing a substantial portion of that pool to careerism at the expense of reproduction is probably going to be a disaster for the African American community, and maybe Hispanics too.

Populations are dynamic, not static. Selection pressure moves them one way or another, and given enough authority and enough time you could forge a nation to rival peak White civilization out of darkest Africa. Regrettably, we're doing the opposite here and across the ocean by constraining the highest quality individuals and fully subsidizing the reproduction of the lowest quality individuals. It may be several steps ahead of our current predicament, so much so that it probably is not worth giving a whole lot of consideration at present, but eventually, even with the advent of ubiquitous ethno-nationalism, without a permanent social institution culling the lowest quality among us, the White populations will continue to experience a decline in quality. It is a massive mistake to assume that by simply removing the Jews, the Negros, the Hispanics and the Muslims, everything will carry on as happily as we want it to. Whatever arises out the ashes of the American Empire must, must keep a clear focus on biological realities, both external and internal.

If there's a silver lining to all of this, it's that the lowest quality Whites seem to be the most liberal, and the least likely to have children.

Becoming Unhinged

From NBC News: House Democrats Attempting New Strategy To Remove Trump

You can't help but wonder what, exactly, is going on. I don't much indulge in conspiracy theories. While they are interesting and a sort of fun idle amusement, there's too much background noise to get a clear picture on certain topics.

Trump Derangement Syndrome affects the lower echelons of the Left because young Leftists aspire to elite status. Leftists, millennials in particular, are exceptionally sensitive to social rank, and take cues from the actual ruling elite. Because the ruling elite themselves have reached levels of derangement heretofore thought impossible, the masses take note and follow along. Behaving like the elite is a cheap and easy way to posture as elites. The only real question that remains to be answered with regards to pleb behavior is how much of the outrage machine will be mitigated by an improved economy? When people have jobs, money, and other ancillary concerns they tend to worry about politics a lot less. For what its worth, if the economy improves and if it becomes increasingly hard to pretend that life in the Trumpenreich is as bad as Hitler's Germany vis-a-vis jobs, falling crime rates, etc. then anticipate a decline in enthusiasm among rank and file Leftists. Over time, the culling of those whose support is not quite at the level of a True Believer (Bernie Bros might be the biggest demographic slice here) will leave only the elites and the blue hairs.

But none of that really concerns me.

Far more disturbing is the behavior of the elites. I suspect that even after the aforementioned legislation fails, they will get right back up and try something new. It is curious that they don't seem to realize the danger their behavior poses to their already tenuous grasp on power. With each failed narrative, their authority fails and more of Heritage America gets ready to make a cold civil war go live. Their behavior, particularly the assassination/morality plays, also seeps into the rank and file, who have a much larger set of mentally unhinged actors as a percentage of their population than the Right currently does. James T. Hodgkinson's Facebook was essentially a small devotional altar to the living gods of Progressive Leftism. He most certainly thought himself a martyr. The incessant crusade to remove Trump from office, essentially blowing through all the political capital in their reserves, vaguely reminds me of a scene from John Gardner's novel Grendel, where the creature Grendel is confronted by, and easily evades, a charging bull that futilely attacks him in the exact same fashion despite the lack of effect.

The question that remains to be answered, that I cannot answer, is whether or not the elite and the media are attacking Trump because they are wayward and stupid like the bull in Grendel, or because they are rationally deducing that Trump remaining in office will be a catastrophe for them.

It is entirely possible that the meta-organization of the Left, which is entirely calibrated to stay on the offensive, is completely out of their element when they're forced to defend. This may explain why none of these people have given much thought to the rumblings of hatred and rage pouring out from the hinterlands, or "flyover country" as they disparagingly call it. Removing Trump from office is sure to set off political violence, if not an outright civil war. That said, considering how devious, determined and clever the Left generally is, I can't help but suspect that the quest to remove Trump from office is a desperate last stand to hide some sort of horrible truth, and that there is far more going on here than anyone fully sees.